Get 40% Off
🤯 This Tech Portfolio is up 29% YTD! Join Now to Get April’s Top PicksGet The Picks – Just 99 USD

Better Banking Stock: Toronto-Dominion (TSX:TD) vs. Royal Bank (TSX:RY)

Published 2019-05-16, 03:00 p/m
Updated 2019-05-16, 03:05 p/m
Better Banking Stock: Toronto-Dominion (TSX:TD) vs. Royal Bank (TSX:RY)

Better Banking Stock: Toronto-Dominion (TSX:TD) vs. Royal Bank (TSX:RY)

Better Banking Stock: Toronto-Dominion (TSX:TD) vs. Royal Bank (TSX:RY)

Today, I’ll look at two of the largest Canadian banks by asset value. Uncannily, both banks have a total of $1.334 trillion worth of assets in the trailing 12 months as of the last reporting.

First, a background on valuation and, in particular, valuation of financial firms.

Valuing financial services firms is notoriously difficult.

First, the treatment of debt does not apply as neatly as it does at “traditional” businesses like Coca-Cola (NYSE:KO) or even Amazon (NASDAQ:AMZN). Debt (or liabilities as a line item) is treated as a raw material rather than a source of financing. As banks borrow money (or take deposits) and lend it out at higher rates, it is obvious why analysts treat debt at a financial firm as an operating item.

Second, I must treat capital expenditures (capex) differently. In most cases, the capex at a financial firm is intangible. Traditionally, banks do not spend major amounts of money to expand physical plants or R&D. Most of their capex are actually hidden in operating expenditures, namely in training staff and building the brand through marketing channels and sales programs.

Third, if I use traditional working capital metrics, valuation will be distorted, as banks record current assets and liabilities to their respective market values. Working capital will be volatile and useless in this case.

With those out of the way, I cannot use traditional free cash flow approaches. A popular way to compensate for these weaknesses in traditional metrics, while still using a Warren Buffett approved method of valuing financial firms through a discounted cash flow approach; I will use the excess returns method.

The excess returns method values equity as such: the current value of equity plus the present value of expected excess equity returns. The former is simply found on the firm’s balance sheet, while the latter is the following: (return on equity – cost of equity) * (current equity base).

Many inputs in the model are overly “scholarized” and, in many successful investors’ opinions, do not work well in practice; it may be fruitful to estimate these numbers based on historical figures. With this in mind, we will begin our valuation on Toronto-Dominion Bank (TSX:TD)(NYSE:TD ) and Royal Bank of Canada (TSX:RY)(NYSE:RY). For the purposes of this article, I will focus mainly on relative valuation.

TD and RBC are both exceptionally well-run banks; I will study these firms through three lenses: their current valuation ratios, loan portfolios, and management teams. Currently, both banks are trading at a P/(TTM E) of about 12.3 compared to the industry average of 11.4. P/B is 1.8 and two for TD and RY, respectively. Both banks are valued around the same, according to market consensus.

TD had recently issued higher provisions for loan losses, which may mean overall macroeconomic stalling in Canada. Perhaps RBC has not issued such provisions yet, as it is more globally diversified than TD is. In any case, both banks will have to deal with macroeconomic challenges, as they brace themselves for volatile markets and uncertain environments.

In evaluating management teams, it is crucial to begin with the compensation structure of key personnel. Are they being compensated fairly and in line with business performance?

According to a recent CBC article, the Big Five banks’ CEOs received a pay hike, with Bharat Masrani’s being the largest. He received $15.3 million for the fiscal 2018. On an absolute basis, it is a huge amount, but on a relative basis, TD performed exceptionally well for the year, both from an earnings perspective and an asset base perspective. Both grew about 4-5% in 2018. RBC’s CEO experienced a similar pay increase, albeit a less drastic jump.

There is lots to like about the two financial institutions and many ways to value them. Both banks have similar valuations, management compensation structures, and competitive asset bases. Moreover, both banks have excellent credit quality and will be good holdings for the long run.

John Mackey, CEO of Whole Foods Market, an Amazon subsidiary, is a member of The Motley Fool’s board of directors. The Motley Fool owns shares of Amazon. Fool contributor Luke On has no position in the companies mentioned.

The Motley Fool’s purpose is to help the world invest, better. Click here now for your free subscription to Take Stock, The Motley Fool Canada’s free investing newsletter. Packed with stock ideas and investing advice, it is essential reading for anyone looking to build and grow their wealth in the years ahead. Motley Fool Canada 2019

This Article Was First Published on The Motley Fool

Latest comments

Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.