
Please try another search
Portfolio construction can vary wildly in complexity. On one end, you have all-in-one asset allocation ETFs which provide a range of stock/bond allocations for investors of all risk tolerances. In the middle, you have elegant three-ETF portfolios like Dan Bortolotti's Canadian Couch Potato strategy.
On the other end of the spectrum, you have DIY investors who slice and dice their portfolio with five or more ETFs in order to pursue lower costs, overweigh certain geographies, or target specific sectors. A great way to find the right ETF for this purpose is via the NEO ETF Screener.
Today, I have a suggestion for a highly cost-effective, globally diversified portfolio of stocks and bonds that can be created by mixing and matching five index ETFs from Scotiabank (TSX:BNS). All five of these ETFs are listed on the NEO Exchange and are passively managed with rock-bottom expense ratios.
When constructing this portfolio, we need to keep three considerations in mind before we select and allocate our ETFs of choice:
The goal of this portfolio isn't to outperform the market. Rather, it's to capture most of the global market's average returns at a low cost. With consistent contributions and good investing habits, this portfolio is easily capable of funding a lucrative retirement.
As noted earlier, we will be using Scotiabank ETFs, but any provider with low-cost index ETFs would be suitable. Here's what I would personally use for an 80/20 stock/bond allocation. Clicking on each ETF will take you to a page where you can view their details.
To make this portfolio more conservative, investors simply dial up the bond ETF allocation, or increase the allocation to spare cash. If you really want to get fancy, adding alternative ETFs could work as well, but make sure you're familiar with their risks and construction.
Now, these proportions are what I would prefer, which is to stick closely to world market-cap weights. Some investors may prefer to a certain geography, but keep in mind that this is a form of active management and can either pay off or backfire.
In the allocations I suggested, investors are looking at a weighted average expense ratio of around 0.13%, which is significantly cheaper compared to a comparable 80/20 asset allocation ETF like the Vanguard Growth ETF Portfolio (VGRO).
However, keep in mind that trading commissions and bid-ask spreads can quickly add to the implicit costs of managing this portfolio. To keep these to a minimum, consider using a zero-commission brokerage or portfolio rebalancing service like Passiv, and always setting limit orders.
This content was originally published by our partners at the Canadian ETF Marketplace.
The ETF industry continues to grow and develop at a breakneck pace, which makes keeping up with new developments more and more difficult by the day. Thankfully, for ETF aficionados...
When it comes to income-oriented offerings, the Canadian ETF industry excels. Specifically, ETFs employing derivative income strategies have become immensely popular in recent...
Upon the adoption of the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework (GBF) at COP15 in December 2022, the global community has committed to 23 targets by 2030 to halt and...
Are you sure you want to block %USER_NAME%?
By doing so, you and %USER_NAME% will not be able to see any of each other's Investing.com's posts.
%USER_NAME% was successfully added to your Block List
Since you’ve just unblocked this person, you must wait 48 hours before renewing the block.
I feel that this comment is:
Thank You!
Your report has been sent to our moderators for review
Add a Comment
We encourage you to use comments to engage with users, share your perspective and ask questions of authors and each other. However, in order to maintain the high level of discourse we’ve all come to value and expect, please keep the following criteria in mind:
Perpetrators of spam or abuse will be deleted from the site and prohibited from future registration at Investing.com’s discretion.