Get 40% Off
🚀 AI-picked stocks soar in May. PRFT is +55%—in just 16 days! Don’t miss June’s top picks.Unlock full list

UPDATE 1-Impax broke U.S. antitrust law by delaying generic drug, jury told

Published 2018-03-12, 06:00 p/m
© Reuters.  UPDATE 1-Impax broke U.S. antitrust law by delaying generic drug, jury told
CVS
-
BHC
-
AMRX
-

By Nate Raymond

BOSTON, March 12 (Reuters) - Impax Laboratories Inc IPXL.O went to trial on Monday over allegations by major retailers and consumers that the company agreed to delay launching a generic version of acne medication Solodyn in exchange for millions of dollars from the manufacturer.

The trial in Boston federal court is one of a handful to have taken place since the U.S. Supreme Court in 2013 said so-called "pay-for-delay" settlements resolving pharmaceutical patent lawsuits can violate antitrust laws.

The settlements occur when a brand-name drugmaker pays a generic rival to delay releasing a cheaper version of its product in exchange for resolving court challenges to patents covering the treatment.

A lawyer for Impax, in his opening statement, denied there was any such arrangement to delay Solodyn's entry to the market.

Richard Arnold, a lawyer for the retailers, told jurors in his opening statement that Impax in 2008 settled a lawsuit it filed challenging a "weak" patent Medicis Pharmaceutical Corp held for Solodyn by agreeing to delay releasing its a generic version until 2011.

In exchange, Impax received $40 million, allowing Medicis to maintain its Solodyn monopoly longer, Arnold said.

"Instead of competing in the way we expect businesses to compete, they choose to pay off Impax to delay entry into the market for three years," Arnold said.

He said but-for that settlement, Impax would have launched its generic version "at-risk" while the litigation continued.

But Douglas Baldridge, Impax's lawyer, noted the U.S. Food and Drug Administration did not approve Impax's drug until February 2009 post-settlement and that its arrangement with Medicis allowed it to release a generic version before Medicis' patent expired in February 2018.

"How can that be delayed entry?" he asked.

The case is being pursued by a class of consumers, third-party insurers and by several retailers, including CVS Health Corp (NYSE:CVS) CVS.N and Rite Aid Corp RAD.N .

Jurors are being asked only to determine liability because damages will be determined at a later trial.

Impax on Saturday reached a deal to resolve part of the litigation it faced over Solodyn, agreeing to pay $35 million to resolve claims by a class of direct purchasers such as retailers and wholesalers. Pharmaceuticals International Inc VRX.TO , which in 2012 acquired Medicis, in February said it would pay $58 million to resolve related claims against it. for the consumers and insurers have said they were overcharged by up to $790.3 million and that the defendants were unjustly enriched by up to $803.3 million, according to an October court ruling.

Under federal antitrust law, any damages would be tripled.

The case is In re Solodyn (Minocycline Hydrochloride) Antitrust Litigation, U.S. District Court, District of Massachusetts, No. 14-md-02503.

Latest comments

Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.