Vatican 'misrepresentations' condemned in court defeat over London property case

Published 2021-03-26, 10:22 a/m
© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: A general view of empty Saint Peter's Square, after a decree orders for the whole of Italy to be on lockdown in an unprecedented clampdown aimed at beating the coronavirus, as seen from Rome

By Philip Pullella

VATICAN CITY (Reuters) - A British court has handed the Vatican a major defeat in a case linked to a property transaction in London with Church funds, in a ruling that revealed some of the Holy See's inner workings and found it had made "appalling" misrepresentations.

The Crown Court in Southwark revoked an earlier order that had frozen funds of Gianluigi Torzi, an Italian businessman who the Vatican has charged with extortion, embezzlement, aggravated fraud and money laundering.

Torzi, who denies wrongdoing, was one of the middlemen in a complicated deal by the Vatican's Secretariat of State in the purchase of a building in Chelsea that has since developed into a financial scandal.

He spent 10 days in a Vatican jail last year. Five Vatican employees lost their jobs in 2019 over the deal and are still under investigation.

In the 42-page ruling, issued on March 10 and made public this week after the Vatican tried to keep it private, Judge Tony Baumgartner said he revoked an earlier ruling to freeze some of Torzi's funds in London partly because the Vatican's "non-disclosures and misrepresentations are so appalling".

Vatican spokesman Matteo Bruni said there was no immediate comment on the ruling, adding that the Vatican's investigation was continuing.

Vatican prosecutors have alleged that Torzi was part of a conspiracy to defraud the Secretariat of State, the Vatican's most important department, and extort millions of euros from it, in part through fees the Vatican called exorbitant.

Torzi's lawyers, Stuart Biggs and James Mullion of Janes Solicitors, said his dealings had been directly or indirectly approved by top Vatican officials, including Secretary of State Cardinal Pietro Parolin and his deputy for general affairs, Archbishop Edgar Pena Parra.

The ruling says that during the hearings, Vatican lawyers attempted to show "the astonishment of higher authorities" over some of the financial details of the deal negotiated by two lower-level officials in the Secretariat, including a monsignor.

But the judge ruled that if that was the case, both Parolin and Pena Parra "must have had the wool pulled completely over their eyes."

Torzi has always maintained his dealings with the Vatican were above board," his lawyer, Mullion, told Reuters on Friday.

"The judge rightly found very troubling failures by the Vatican to disclose the full facts of the case," Mullion said. "The people who signed the contracts were signing them with the authority of the Vatican."

He said the Vatican had made a request to keep the details of the ruling private.

The Vatican hired Torzi in 2018 to negotiate the final purchase of the building at 60 Sloane Avenue and end its relationship with Raffaele Mincione, another Italian middleman used previously for the deal.

An internal investigation into the purchase of the building became public in October 2019 following a Vatican police raid. Five Vatican employees were suspended.

The London ruling showed that, during the case, Torzi claimed that one of the Vatican employees who was suspended, a non-cleric, offered him the services of a prostitute but that he refused.

© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: A general view of empty Saint Peter's Square, after a decree orders for the whole of Italy to be on lockdown in an unprecedented clampdown aimed at beating the coronavirus, as seen from Rome

Last November, Pope Francis transferred control of the Secretariat's funds to another department for financial oversight.

Latest comments

Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2025 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.