Cyber Monday Deal: Up to 60% off InvestingProCLAIM SALE

Pro-Ripple Lawyer Says Why SEC Faces Biggest Challenge in Next Move

Published 2023-07-19, 08:05 a/m
Pro-Ripple Lawyer Says Why SEC Faces Biggest Challenge in Next Move
XRP/USD
-

U.Today - CryptoLaw founder , who is an XRP holders' attorney, identifies the most difficult hurdle for the SEC going forward in the Ripple lawsuit.

On July 13, Judge Analisa Torres granted summary judgment in favor of Labs regarding XRP's status as a security.

In response, Gary Gensler, the chair of the Securities and Exchange Commission, stated that he was "disappointed" with the judge's decision that XRP was not a security when sold to individual investors on exchanges. "We’re still looking at it and assessing that opinion," he said.

Given this, some warned that an appeal from the SEC could be a possibility.

If the SEC decides to take a step ahead by pushing the case to the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, Deaton anticipates that the agency might meet a difficult hurdle in challenging the ruling.

According to him, Judge Torres applied the Howey Test strictly to each type of XRP sale the SEC claimed violated the law. The Supreme Court in Howey made it crystal clear that all that matters in an investment contract transaction or scheme is whether the Howey Test is satisfied.

Deaton shared a screenshot of a footnote from the ruling, which reads, "The court holds only that a common enterprise existed between Ripple and the institutional buyers. The court does not reach the question of whether the common enterprise extends to encompass other XRP holders, Defendants Garlinghouse and Larsen, the XRP ecosystem, or any other entities."

Given this, Deaton states that common enterprise might be a difficult hurdle for the SEC if the case goes to the second circuit.This is because Judge Torres might say that the common enterprise factor is not satisfied between holders and Ripple, or she could rule that consumptive intent is an issue for the jury since the SEC's expert's opinion was excluded.

Deaton pointed out that Judge Torres left open the question of whether programmatic sales on exchanges meet the first and second requirements of the Howey Test.

If the 2nd Circuit reverses the judge's decision on the third factor, all that will happen is that she then applies the first two factors. Deaton added that she could determine the same result by applying the first two factors, which he says is a brilliant move.

Capping his arguments, the CryptoLaw founder pointed out that the SEC lost and that her decision was a sound application of the Howey Test.

This article was originally published on U.Today

Latest comments

Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.