Breaking News

"I am proud to be a feminist": Will Meghan shake up Britain's royals?

EconomyMay 21, 2018 07:34
Saved. See Saved Items.
This article has already been saved in your Saved Items
© Reuters. "I am proud to be a feminist": Will Meghan shake up Britain's royals?

By Michael Holden

LONDON, May 21 (Reuters) - A biography of Britain's latest royal, Meghan Markle, appeared on the monarchy's official website within hours of her marrying Queen Elizabeth's grandson Prince Harry on Saturday, with a single quote: "I am proud to be a woman and a feminist".

To royal watchers, it represented a statement of intent and a clear demonstration of a new, modern path the 1,000-year-old British monarchy will be treading as it seeks to remain relevant in a fast-changing political climate exemplified by Brexit.

"Just 20 years ago, the monarchy seemed to be struggling for its very survival," said the Daily Mail newspaper, referring to the Windsors' grimmest hours in the aftermath of the death of Harry's mother Princess Diana in a Paris car crash in 1997 when the family were heavily criticised for seeming not to care.

"How different the picture looks today. Prince Harry's wedding to the glamorous and thoroughly modern actress Meghan Markle did more than put the seal on a fairytale romance.

"It symbolized the monarchy's evolution into a contemporary institution - at ease with itself, outward looking and fit for the 21st Century."

Saturday's wedding of Harry and Meghan, who has an African American mother and white father, has been widely hailed as a union of tradition and modernity and a breakthrough in race relations.

The bride entered the church alone, while a passionate address by Michael Curry, the first black head of the Episcopal Church in the United States, which electrified Windsor Castle's 15th century St George's Chapel, has been pored over for its symbolism. The royal biography of Meghan, the newly titled Duchess of Sussex, has been seen as showing another departure from the usual stuffy image of the monarchy.

"From a young age, The Duchess had a keen awareness of social issues and actively participated in charitable work," it says. "Aged 11 she successfully campaigned for a company to alter their television advert that had used sexist language to sell washing-up liquid."


Commentators said it indicated the royal family, which traditionally steers clear of making overtly political statements, had given its blessing to her to speak out on issues such as feminism.

"It's sure changed the Royal Family," historian and constitutional expert David Starkey wrote in the Sun newspaper of the marriage.

"Meghan and Harry are the model modern couple: Mature, bi-racial, bi-cultural, international, do-gooding, fashion-conscious and media-savvy to their fingertips."

British newspapers on Monday dedicated dozens of souvenir pages to every tiny detail of the wedding, while the British TV audience was reported to be almost 18 million, making it the most watched programme of the year so far.

But amidst the eulogies, some have suggested that beneath the splendid show of pomp and pageantry, where Britain boasts it has few rivals, little might change.

"The royal family is not a place where you can make any strong, particular statements," Kehinde Andrews, an associate professor of sociology at Birmingham City University and author on race issues told Reuters.

He said the wedding was meaningless for Britain's black community in terms of addressing entrenched racism in job prospects, the criminal justice system and health disparities.

"When we sit back and actually analyse what's happened and what's changed, we'll realise it means nothing at all," he said.

Ironically, by being more modern and more relatable to ordinary Britons, the younger royals such as Harry, his elder brother Prince William and his wife Kate, who are at the forefront of the overhaul of the Windsors, risk destroying the mystique which gives the institution its cachet.

"I think the young royals do have to be careful because although they are trying to become much more touchy-feely and accessible, they are in danger of devaluing the brand because the brand is based on the fairytale and the fact they aren't accessible," royal biographer Claudia Joseph told Reuters.

"It's a very difficult line for them to tread." (Editing by Guy Faulconbridge)

"I am proud to be a feminist": Will Meghan shake up Britain's royals?

Add a Comment

Comment Guidelines

We encourage you to use comments to engage with users, share your perspective and ask questions of authors and each other. However, in order to maintain the high level of discourse we’ve all come to value and expect, please keep the following criteria in mind: 

  • Enrich the conversation
  • Stay focused and on track. Only post material that’s relevant to the topic being discussed.
  • Be respectful. Even negative opinions can be framed positively and diplomatically.
  •  Use standard writing style. Include punctuation and upper and lower cases.
  • NOTE: Spam and/or promotional messages and links within a comment will be removed
  • Avoid profanity, slander or personal attacks directed at an author or another user.
  • Don’t Monopolize the Conversation. We appreciate passion and conviction, but we also believe strongly in giving everyone a chance to air their thoughts. Therefore, in addition to civil interaction, we expect commenters to offer their opinions succinctly and thoughtfully, but not so repeatedly that others are annoyed or offended. If we receive complaints about individuals who take over a thread or forum, we reserve the right to ban them from the site, without recourse.
  • Only English comments will be allowed.

Perpetrators of spam or abuse will be deleted from the site and prohibited from future registration at’s discretion.

Write your thoughts here
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
Post also to:
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Thanks for your comment. Please note that all comments are pending until approved by our moderators. It may therefore take some time before it appears on our website.
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Add Chart to Comment
Confirm Block

Are you sure you want to block %USER_NAME%?

By doing so, you and %USER_NAME% will not be able to see any of each other's's posts.

%USER_NAME% was successfully added to your Block List

Since you’ve just unblocked this person, you must wait 48 hours before renewing the block.

Report this comment

I feel that this comment is:

Comment flagged

Thank You!

Your report has been sent to our moderators for review
Disclaimer: Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. All CFDs (stocks, indexes, futures) and Forex prices are not provided by exchanges but rather by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual market price, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Therefore Fusion Media doesn`t bear any responsibility for any trading losses you might incur as a result of using this data.

Fusion Media or anyone involved with Fusion Media will not accept any liability for loss or damage as a result of reliance on the information including data, quotes, charts and buy/sell signals contained within this website. Please be fully informed regarding the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, it is one of the riskiest investment forms possible.
Continue with Google
Sign up with Email