NVDA gained a massive 197% since our AI first added it in November - is it time to sell? 🤔Read more

Bieber, Usher win dismissal of copyright lawsuit

Published 2017-01-06, 10:25 a/m
© Reuters.  Bieber, Usher win dismissal of copyright lawsuit
VIV
-
SONY
-

By Jonathan Stempel

Jan 6 (Reuters) - A federal judge has dismissed a $10 million lawsuit accusing Justin Bieber and Usher of illegally copying parts of their song "Somebody to Love" from an identically titled song by two Virginia songwriters.

In an order on Thursday, U.S. District Judge Arenda Wright Allen in Norfolk, Virginia adopted a federal magistrate judge's finding that Devin Copeland and his cousin Mareio Overton failed to show that Bieber and Usher had access to their 2008 song before creating their own work in early 2010.

Allen dismissed the lawsuit with prejudice, meaning it cannot be brought again.

Duncan Byers, a lawyer for the plaintiffs, did not immediately respond on Friday to requests for comment.

In a court filing last month, Copeland, who performs as De Rico, and Overton said they had resolved their disputes with Bieber, and with Vivendi SA's VIV.PA Universal Music Group and Def Jam Recordings.

Usher, whose full name is Usher Raymond, and Sony Corp's 6758.T Sony/ATV Musical Publishing LLC were among the other defendants.

Allen had first dismissed the lawsuit in March 2014, but a federal appeals court revived the case in June 2015, saying a jury could find the songs' choruses "intrinsically similar."

Bieber and Usher claimed that their song was based on a November 2009 version by songwriter Heather Bright and a production trio, The Stereotypes.

But the plaintiffs said music industry executives had given the singers access sooner.

They also said the magistrate judge made several errors, including by deciding that songs were not "strikingly similar" rather than leaving that question for a jury. said the plaintiffs' objections were without merit.

Bieber's version of "Somebody to Love" credited him as a co-writer, and peaked at No. 15 on the Billboard Hot 100.

The case is Copeland et al v. Bieber et al, U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Virginia, No, 13-00246.

Latest comments

Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.