NVDA gained a massive 197% since our AI first added it in November - is it time to sell? 🤔Read more

Impax faces U.S. antitrust trial over generic acne drug's delay

Published 2018-03-12, 11:10 a/m
© Reuters.  Impax faces U.S. antitrust trial over generic acne drug's delay
CVS
-
WBA
-
BHC
-
AMRX
-

By Nate Raymond

BOSTON, March 12 (Reuters) - Impax Laboratories Inc IPXL.O went to trial on Monday over claims by major retailers and consumers that the company agreed to delay launching a generic version of Solodyn in exchange for millions of dollars from the acne medication's manufacturer.

Jury selection began in Boston federal court in a case centered on an alleged "pay-for-delay" settlement, in which a generic manufacturer agrees to resolve legal challenges to a brand-name drug's patents and delay making a cheaper version.

The trial is one of a handful to have taken place since the U.S. Supreme Court in 2013 said that such settlements, which also involve brand-name drug companies paying the generic manufacturers, can be found to be anticompetitive.

The case is being pursued by a class of consumers and third-party insurers and by several retailers, including CVS Health Corp (NYSE:CVS) CVS.N , Walgreens Boots Alliance Inc WBA.O and Rite Aid Corp RAD.N .

They allege Impax in 2008 received $40 million from Medicis Pharmaceutical Corp plus $23 million in "milestone" payments after agreeing to drop an appeal of a ruling dismissing a lawsuit that Impax filed that sought to invalidate a Solodyn patent.

While Hayward, California-based Impax received U.S. Food and Drug Administration approval for its generic version of Solodyn in February 2009, the settlement allowed Impax to instead begin selling the drug in November 2011, the plaintiffs allege.

They contend that, but for the settlement, Impax would have launched its generic version "at-risk" while the litigation was continuing. Impax denies that allegation.

Impax, which in October agreed to combine with Amneal Pharmaceuticals LLC, denies wrongdoing and contends that its deal with Medicis did not delay competition.

The trial came after Impax on Saturday reached a deal to resolve part of the litigation it faced over Solodyn, agreeing to pay $35 million to resolve claims by a class of direct purchasers such as retailers and wholesalers. Pharmaceuticals International Inc VRX.TO , which in 2012 acquired Medicis, in February said it would pay $58 million to resolve related claims against it. trial is expected to last four weeks. Jurors will be asked only to determine liability because damages will be determined at a later trial.

Lawyers for the consumers and insurers have said they were overcharged by up to $790.3 million and that the defendants were unjustly enriched by up to $803.3 million, according to an October court ruling.

Under federal antitrust law, any damages would be tripled.

The case is In re Solodyn (Minocycline Hydrochloride) Antitrust Litigation, U.S. District Court, District of Massachusetts, No. 14-md-02503.

Latest comments

Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.