Breaking News
Investing Pro 0
Final hours: unlock premium data with Claim 60% OFF

Biden's Fuel Economy Standards: Big Three Could Face Steep Penalties

Published Oct 02, 2023 18:06 Updated Oct 02, 2023 18:16
Saved. See Saved Items.
This article has already been saved in your Saved Items
 
© Reuters. Biden's Fuel Economy Standards: Big Three Could Face Steep Penalties
 
STLAM
+0.45%
Add to/Remove from a Portfolio
Add to Watchlist
Add Position

Position added successfully to:

Please name your holdings portfolio
 
GM
+0.69%
Add to/Remove from a Portfolio
Add to Watchlist
Add Position

Position added successfully to:

Please name your holdings portfolio
 
VOWG_p
+1.16%
Add to/Remove from a Portfolio
Add to Watchlist
Add Position

Position added successfully to:

Please name your holdings portfolio
 
F
+1.80%
Add to/Remove from a Portfolio
Add to Watchlist
Add Position

Position added successfully to:

Please name your holdings portfolio
 

Quiver Quantitative - U.S. President Joe Biden's administration has put forth a proposal to raise fuel economy standards through 2032. If these standards are accepted, major automakers could face significant fines for non-compliance. Specifically, General Motors (NYSE:GM) is staring down a potential fine of $6.5 billion, while Stellantis, the parent company of Chrysler, might be penalized $3 billion. These numbers were highlighted in a letter from the American Automotive Policy Council, which represents GM, Stellantis, and Ford Motor (NYSE:F). The council has described the potential fines, stemming from not meeting the proposed Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) requirements, as "alarming." Furthermore, Ford could face around $1 billion in penalties, with Volkswagen (ETR:VOWG_p) encountering a similar amount, the largest amongst foreign automakers.

Both GM and Stellantis chose not to comment beyond the contents of the letter, while Ford and VW have yet to respond. The core of the issue, as expressed in the letter to the U.S. Energy Department, is the proposed alteration of the "Petroleum Equivalency Factor." The Detroit automakers believe this change could lead to "disproportionately higher compliance costs" for them compared to their counterparts. This new policy might inadvertently benefit automakers that have been slow to transition to electric vehicles.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) aims to increase CAFE standards, targeting an average of 58 miles per gallon fleet-wide by 2032. This would mean hiking requirements by 2% per year for passenger cars and 4% for SUVs and pickup trucks. The Department of Energy (DOE) plans to adjust how it calculates petroleum-equivalent fuel economy for electric vehicles under this program. Responding to concerns, the DOE reached out to major automakers, emphasizing the potential balance between encouraging electric vehicle adoption and the risk of increased petroleum use due to more lenient fuel economy standards for traditional vehicles.

Last week, a group representing most major automakers voiced concerns, suggesting that the industry could be looking at a cumulative $14 billion in CAFE fines. NHTSA refrained from commenting immediately but had earlier remarked that the estimates given by automakers align with "our statutory obligations." They added that automakers have the option to pivot to electric vehicles to avoid these penalties. To date, Stellantis and GM have already paid $363 million in fines for previous non-compliance with U.S. fuel economy requirements.

This article was originally published on Quiver Quantitative

Biden's Fuel Economy Standards: Big Three Could Face Steep Penalties
 

Related Articles

Add a Comment

Comment Guidelines

We encourage you to use comments to engage with users, share your perspective and ask questions of authors and each other. However, in order to maintain the high level of discourse we’ve all come to value and expect, please keep the following criteria in mind: 

  • Enrich the conversation
  • Stay focused and on track. Only post material that’s relevant to the topic being discussed.
  • Be respectful. Even negative opinions can be framed positively and diplomatically.
  •  Use standard writing style. Include punctuation and upper and lower cases.
  • NOTE: Spam and/or promotional messages and links within a comment will be removed
  • Avoid profanity, slander or personal attacks directed at an author or another user.
  • Don’t Monopolize the Conversation. We appreciate passion and conviction, but we also believe strongly in giving everyone a chance to air their thoughts. Therefore, in addition to civil interaction, we expect commenters to offer their opinions succinctly and thoughtfully, but not so repeatedly that others are annoyed or offended. If we receive complaints about individuals who take over a thread or forum, we reserve the right to ban them from the site, without recourse.
  • Only English comments will be allowed.

Perpetrators of spam or abuse will be deleted from the site and prohibited from future registration at Investing.com’s discretion.

Write your thoughts here
 
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
 
Post
Post also to:
 
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
1000
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Thanks for your comment. Please note that all comments are pending until approved by our moderators. It may therefore take some time before it appears on our website.
 
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
 
Post
 
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
1000
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Add Chart to Comment
Confirm Block

Are you sure you want to block %USER_NAME%?

By doing so, you and %USER_NAME% will not be able to see any of each other's Investing.com's posts.

%USER_NAME% was successfully added to your Block List

Since you’ve just unblocked this person, you must wait 48 hours before renewing the block.

Report this comment

I feel that this comment is:

Comment flagged

Thank You!

Your report has been sent to our moderators for review
Continue with Google
or
Sign up with Email