An Ipsos survey commissioned by MNP LTD has shed light on a growing trend among Canadians termed "inflation isolation," where individuals are increasingly staying home to manage the financial strain from rising living costs. This behavior is a direct response to the country's economic pressures, which have been mounting since the Bank of Canada's aggressive interest rate hikes began in March 2022. The findings, released today, highlight the psychological impact of the financial landscape on Canadians, particularly younger demographics.
On Wednesday, prior to the survey's release, Bank of Canada Governor Tiff Macklem acknowledged that the central bank's rate hikes could be nearing their intended effect in combating inflation, although he underscored the need for continued evaluation. Then today, during an event with the Saint John Chamber of Commerce, Macklem addressed the challenges Canadians face with persistent high inflation and steep interest rates, acknowledging widespread discontent but resisting calls to lower the policy rate, despite October's slight easing of living costs.
The financial strain has manifested in various ways for Canadian households. Homeowners are grappling with ballooning mortgage payments, and many are prioritizing basic necessities over entertainment or travel due to escalating food costs. The Ipsos poll indicates that 34% of Canadians are dealing with heftier monthly debt payments, while nearly half fear future living costs will lead to more debt accruals. The situation has also taken a toll on mental health, with two-fifths of respondents reporting elevated stress and anxiety levels, particularly those with severe personal debt or earning below $40,000 annually.
The latest inflation data released on Tuesday indicates a year-over-year inflation rate of 3.1% in October, with New Brunswick (NYSE:BC) reporting a slightly lower rate of 2.8%. Despite these figures suggesting a trend toward easing, Macklem emphasized the necessity for consistent results within the Bank of Canada's one-to-three-percent target range before considering rate reductions. He did not dismiss the possibility of further rate increases if high inflation persists.
Macklem avoided direct criticism of current government spending in relation to inflation but noted that no new pressures were expected based on recent fiscal updates. He also drew historical parallels to stringent measures taken in the early 1980s to control rampant inflation.
This article was generated with the support of AI and reviewed by an editor. For more information see our T&C.