Stock Story -
Material handling equipment manufacturer Columbus McKinnon (NASDAQ:CMCO) fell short of the market’s revenue expectations in Q3 CY2024, with sales falling 6.2% year on year to $242.3 million. Its non-GAAP profit of $0.70 per share wasin line with analysts’ consensus estimates.
Is now the time to buy Columbus McKinnon? Find out by reading the original article on StockStory, it’s free.
Columbus McKinnon (CMCO) Q3 CY2024 Highlights:
- Revenue: $242.3 million vs analyst estimates of $248.7 million (2.6% miss)
- Adjusted EPS: $0.70 vs analyst expectations of $0.70 (in line)
- EBITDA: $39.15 million vs analyst estimates of $39.81 million (1.6% miss)
- Gross Margin (GAAP): 30.9%, down from 38.7% in the same quarter last year
- Operating Margin: 4.5%, down from 12.9% in the same quarter last year
- EBITDA Margin: 16.2%, down from 17.7% in the same quarter last year
- Free Cash Flow Margin: 1.6%, down from 4.5% in the same quarter last year
- Market Capitalization: $930.1 million
Company OverviewWith 19 different brands across the globe, Columbus McKinnon (NASDAQ:CMCO) offers material handling equipment for the construction, manufacturing, and transportation industries.
General Industrial Machinery
Automation that increases efficiency and connected equipment that collects analyzable data have been trending, creating new demand for general industrial machinery companies. Those who innovate and create digitized solutions can spur sales and speed up replacement cycles, but all general industrial machinery companies are still at the whim of economic cycles. Consumer spending and interest rates, for example, can greatly impact the industrial production that drives demand for these companies’ offerings.Sales Growth
Examining a company’s long-term performance can provide clues about its business quality. Any business can put up a good quarter or two, but the best consistently grow over the long haul. Regrettably, Columbus McKinnon’s sales grew at a sluggish 3.2% compounded annual growth rate over the last five years. This shows it failed to expand in any major way, a rough starting point for our analysis.We at StockStory place the most emphasis on long-term growth, but within industrials, a half-decade historical view may miss cycles, industry trends, or a company capitalizing on catalysts such as a new contract win or a successful product line. Columbus McKinnon’s annualized revenue growth of 4.3% over the last two years is above its five-year trend, but we were still disappointed by the results.
This quarter, Columbus McKinnon missed Wall Street’s estimates and reported a rather uninspiring 6.2% year-on-year revenue decline, generating $242.3 million of revenue.
Looking ahead, sell-side analysts expect revenue to grow 5.5% over the next 12 months. While this projection shows the market believes its newer products and services will spur better performance, it is still below the sector average.
Operating Margin
Operating margin is one of the best measures of profitability because it tells us how much money a company takes home after procuring and manufacturing its products, marketing and selling them, and, most importantly, keeping them relevant through research and development.Columbus McKinnon has done a decent job managing its cost base over the last five years. The company produced an average operating margin of 8.9%, higher than the broader industrials sector.
Looking at the trend in its profitability, Columbus McKinnon’s annual operating margin might have seen some fluctuations but has generally stayed the same over the last five years. Shareholders will want to see Columbus McKinnon grow its margin in the future.
This quarter, Columbus McKinnon generated an operating profit margin of 4.5%, down 8.4 percentage points year on year. Since Columbus McKinnon’s operating margin decreased more than its gross margin, we can assume it was recently less efficient because expenses such as marketing, R&D, and administrative overhead increased.
Earnings Per Share
We track the long-term change in earnings per share (EPS) for the same reason as long-term revenue growth. Compared to revenue, however, EPS highlights whether a company’s growth was profitable.Sadly for Columbus McKinnon, its EPS declined by 1.8% annually over the last five years while its revenue grew by 3.2%. However, its operating margin didn’t change during this timeframe, telling us that non-fundamental factors affected its ultimate earnings.
We can take a deeper look into Columbus McKinnon’s earnings to better understand the drivers of its performance. A five-year view shows Columbus McKinnon has diluted its shareholders, growing its share count by 20.7%. This has led to lower per share earnings. Taxes and interest expenses can also affect EPS but don’t tell us as much about a company’s fundamentals.
Like with revenue, we analyze EPS over a more recent period because it can give insight into an emerging theme or development for the business.
For Columbus McKinnon, EPS didn’t budge over the last two years, but at least that was better than its five-year trend. We hope its earnings can grow in the coming years. In Q3, Columbus McKinnon reported EPS at $0.70, down from $0.76 in the same quarter last year. This print was close to analysts’ estimates. Over the next 12 months, Wall Street expects Columbus McKinnon’s full-year EPS of $2.81 to grow by 17.7%.