💙 🔷 Not impressed by Big Tech in Q3? Explore these Blue Chip Bargains insteadExplore for free

Infidelity website Ashley Madison facing FTC probe, CEO apologizes

Published 2016-07-05, 03:58 p/m
© Reuters.  Infidelity website Ashley Madison facing FTC probe, CEO apologizes

(Adds quote from lawyer, context on FTC)
By Alastair Sharp and Allison Martell
TORONTO, July 5 (Reuters) - The parent company of infidelity
dating site Ashley Madison, hit by a devastating hack last year,
is now the target of a U.S. Federal Trade Commission
investigation, the new executives seeking to revive its
credibility told Reuters.
The breach, which exposed the personal details of millions
who signed up for the site with the slogan "Life is short. Have
an affair," cost Avid Life Media more than a quarter of its
revenue, Chief Executive Rob Segal and President James
Millership revealed in an interview, the first by any senior
executive since the incident.
"We are profoundly sorry," said Segal, adding that more
could perhaps have been spent on security.
The two executives, hired in April, said the closely held
company is spending millions to improve security and looking at
payment options that offer more privacy.
But it faces a mountain of problems, including U.S. and
Canadian class action lawsuits filed on behalf of customers
whose personal information was posted online, and allegations
that it used fake profiles to manipulate some customers. The
site's male-to-female user ratio is five to one, the executives
said.
An Ernst & Young report commissioned by Avid and shared with
Reuters confirmed that Avid used computer programs, dubbed
fembots, that impersonated real women, striking up conversations
with paying male customers.
Avid shut down the fake profiles in the United States,
Canada and Australia in 2014 and by late 2015 in the rest of the
world, but some U.S. users had message exchanges with foreign
fembots until late in 2015, according to the report.
Another site, JDI Dating, paid $616,165 in redress for
similar practices in an October 2014 settlement with the FTC.
Avid said it does not know the focus of its FTC
investigation. Asked about the fembot messages sent to U.S.
customers, Segal said: "That's a part of the ongoing process
that we're going through ... it's with the FTC right now."
The FTC's consumer protection unit investigates cases of
deceptive advertising, including instances when consumers are
told that their information is secure but then it is handled
sloppily.
Lawrence Walters, a lawyer who represented JDI Dating in the
2014 case, said the FTC will likely look at the hack.
"The FTC is very focused on this data breach issue at this
point," he said. "I'm not surprised that they are continuing to
look at, possibly, Ashley Madison."
An FTC spokesman declined to comment.

REINVENTING EXISTING BRAND
Ashley Madison got plenty of media attention before the
hack, with former chief executive Noel Biderman boasting of a $1
billion valuation.
Segal acknowledged that the company is not worth that much
and said Avid still doesn't know how the attack happened or who
was responsible.
It has hired cyber security experts at Deloitte and expects
to reach the first level of Payment Card Industry compliance, an
industry standard, by September.
"We had to basically reinvent their security posture," said
Robert Masse, who leads Deloitte's incident response team. His
team, hired by the company in late September, found simple
backdoors in Avid Life's Linux-based servers.
Avid Life is on track to record roughly $80 million in
revenue this year, with margin on earnings before interest,
taxation, depreciation and amortization of 35 to 40 percent,
said Millership. Its 2015 revenue was $109 million, with a 49
percent margin.
The executives said the Ashley Madison name would endure,
though they are moving some focus away from infidelity.
"We certainly feel that the Ashley Madison brand can be
repositioned," Segal said.
Millership said they have roughly $50 million to spend on
acquisitions or partnerships with like-minded "discreet dating"
sites.

Latest comments

Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.