💙 🔷 Not impressed by Big Tech in Q3? Explore these Blue Chip Bargains insteadUnlock them all

Canada fertilizer merger faces easier approval at home than in U.S.

Published 2016-09-02, 03:38 p/m
© Reuters.  Canada fertilizer merger faces easier approval at home than in U.S.
SDFGn
-
AGU
-
POT
-
CUS
-
SPB
-

By John Tilak and Diane Bartz

TORONTO/WASHINGTON, Sept 2 (Reuters) - Canada's Potash Corp of Saskatchewan POT.TO and Agrium Inc AGU.TO are more likely to win approval for a potential merger in Canada than the United States, but U.S. rejection of the deal would scuttle it globally, competition lawyers said.

Potash and Agrium confirmed merger talks on Tuesday, a deal that would create a fertilizer and farm-retailing giant. is likely to look more favorably on the combination because its regulators more strongly weigh the potential for achieving efficiencies such as reducing overhead and optimizing shipping. This position has its roots in a desire by policymakers to strengthen companies operating in Canada's smaller market.

"The efficiencies defense will certainly loom large," said Nikiforos Iatrou, competition group chair at law firm WeirFoulds, in Canada.

"It's possible that in this case the efficiencies win the day in Canada but don't carry the day in the United States."

The defense was highlighted this year, when the Canadian Competition Bureau approved a deal between Superior Plus Corp SPB.TO and Canexus Corp CUS.TO , saying that efficiency gains would be greater than the anti-competitive effects.

The U.S. Federal Trade Commission blocked the same deal, which was then scrapped.

U.S. TO FOCUS ON PRODUCT PRICING

Potash and Agrium have significant operations in the United States, which would spur review by the Federal Trade Commission or the Justice Department.

U.S. regulators would focus primarily on prospects for the deal to raise prices for the companies' fertilizer products, which account for as much as one-third of input costs for U.S. corn farmers.

A combined Potash and Agrium would control 62 percent of potash capacity in North America, 30 percent of phosphate production capability and 29 percent of nitrogen capacity, according to National Bank Financial.

Both U.S. regulators have taken an aggressive stance on mergers, said Andrea Murino, co-chair of competition at U.S. law firm Goodwin Procter LLP.

"Just based on the market shares, the deal is going to get some really close scrutiny," she said.

The prospect of having only two big U.S. potash sellers, down from three, might worry antitrust enforcers, said Ethan Glass, a Justice Department veteran now at Quinn, Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan.

The merged company could sell Agrium's Canadian potash mine to ease those worries, he said.

Agrium-Potash's clout could also be diluted by other developments with rival miners Mosaic Co MOS.N and K+S AG SDFGn.DE planning to add capacity in North America.

Under the Canadian review, Potash and Agrium could argue their merger would enable the Canadian company to be a stronger global player.

"This idea of creating a 'national champion' pops up from time to time - and the federal government is often pressured to consider measures that would be supportive of this," said Subrata Bhattacharjee, law firm BLG's vice chair of competition.

The deal may also catch the attention of regulators in China, a major potash buyer. Agrium, Potash and Mosaic sell potash offshore through jointly owned Canpotex.

Huy Do of Canadian law firm Fasken Martineau said Chinese regulators may see the deal as an opportunity to dismantle Canpotex.

<^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Top Canadian-involved deals: agriculture, forestry and fishing

http://tmsnrt.rs/2bESMl3

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^>

Latest comments

Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.