Get 40% Off
👀 👁 🧿 All eyes on Biogen, up +4,56% after posting earnings. Our AI picked it in March 2024.
Which stocks will surge next?
Unlock AI-picked Stocks

UPDATE 3-U.S. lawmakers cut anti-ZTE measure from must-pass defense bill

Published 2018-07-20, 02:04 p/m
Updated 2018-07-20, 02:04 p/m
© Reuters.  UPDATE 3-U.S. lawmakers cut anti-ZTE measure from must-pass defense bill

(Adds Marco Rubio tweet)

WASHINGTON, July 20 (Reuters) - U.S. lawmakers who reached an agreement on a must-pass defense bill cut from the legislation a measure that would have made it harder for the president to undo sanctions slapped on China's ZTE Corp 000063.SZ 0763.HK , a top Democrat in the Senate said on Friday.

Lawmakers from both parties have been at odds with President Donald Trump over his decision to lift a ban on U.S. companies selling to ZTE, allowing China's second-largest telecommunications equipment maker to resume business.

The company had made false statements about disciplining 35 employees involved with illegally shipping U.S.-origin goods to Iran and North Korea, Commerce Department officials said. That led to a ban ordered by the department in April that forced ZTE, which relies on U.S. components for its smartphones and networking gear, to cease major operations.

Top Senate Democrat Chuck Schumer said in a statement that he opposed stripping the provision out of the defense policy bill.

"By stripping the Senate's tough ZTE sanctions provision from the defense bill, President Trump – and the congressional Republicans who acted at his behest – have once again made President Xi and the Chinese Government the big winners," he said in a statement.

Republican Senator Marco Rubio called the change "bad news" in a tweet, lamenting the increased chances the Chinese "controlled" company stays in business.

Democratic Senator Chris Van Hollen, with Republican support, had drafted a measure that would have made it harder for the president to undo the sorts of civil penalty that ZTE faced by requiring him to certify any reversal to appropriate congressional committees.

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

That measure was approved by the Senate as part of the must-pass National Defense Authorization Act, or NDAA, which authorizes military spending. But it was taken out as lawmakers from the Senate and House of Representatives hammered out differences between the two defense policy bills.

"Despite bipartisan support to put American national security before jobs in China, the Republican leadership refused to take any real, substantive action on ZTE. Instead, they joined President Trump in bowing to Beijing. It's weak and shameful," Van Hollen said in a statement.

The Commerce Department removed the ban on ZTE in mid-July shortly after the company deposited $400 million in a U.S. bank escrow account as part of a settlement reached last month. The settlement also included a $1 billion penalty that ZTE paid to the U.S. Treasury in June.

Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross, in announcing the deal, said his department "will remain vigilant as we closely monitor ZTE's actions."

A U.S. investigation into ZTE was launched after Reuters reported in 2012 that the company had signed contracts to ship hardware and software worth millions of dollars to Iran from some of the best-known U.S. technology companies. (https://reut.rs/2GbpCmO)

Latest comments

Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.